1. Conflicts, War, Peace and Social Security2. Democracy and Human Rights3. Ecological and Environmental Protection Movements4. Ethics of Science and Society5. Global Warming and Climate Change6. History and Philosophy of Science7. Information Technology, Mass Media and Culture8. Labour in Organized and Unorganized Sectors9. Nation, States and Emerging Challenges10. Natural Resources, Bio-diversity and Geographic Information System11. Patent Laws and Intellectual Property Rights12. Peasants , Livelihood and Land-use13. Peoples (Dalit, Tribes, Women, Peasants, etc) Struggles and Movements For Equitable Democratic Society14. Engineering Science 14. Peoples Health and Quality of Life15. Political Economy of India17. Rural Technology, Social Organizations and Rural Development18. Science Communication and Science Popularization19. Science Technology and Social Development20. Social Processes, Social Structures and Social Alienation21. Unity of Science/Science of Nature-Humans Society
Follow Us: @IndiaSTS | http://twitter.com/IndiaSTS | http://www.facebook.com/csspjnu/ | http://www.mixcloud.com/cssp_jnu/
Friday, December 7, 2018
CfPs: 42nd Indian Social Science Congress on "Human Future In Digital Era" | 27-31 December at KIIT Bhubaneswar
Tuesday, December 4, 2018
Listen to Audio Record of CSSP Talk "Regulating Biotechnology through the Patent System: Learning from US and European Approaches" delivered by Dr Shobita Parthasarathy.
Abstract: Over the past thirty years, the world's patent systems have experienced pressure from civil society like never before. From farmers to patient advocates, new voices are arguing that patents impact public health, economic inequality, morality—and democracy. These challenges, to domains that we usually consider technical and legal, may seem surprising. But in Patent Politics, the speaker argues that patent systems have always been deeply political and social. To demonstrate this, Parthasarathy takes readers through a particularly fierce and prolonged set of controversies over patents on life forms linked to important advances in biology and agriculture and potentially life-saving medicines in the United States and Europe. Clashes over whose voices and which values matter in the patent system, as well as what counts as knowledge and whose expertise is important, look quite different in these two places. And through these debates, the United States and Europe are developing very different approaches to patent and innovation governance.
About the Speaker: Shobita Parthasarathy is Professor of Public Policy and Women's Studies, and Director of the Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program, at University of Michigan. Her research focuses on the governance of emerging science and technology in comparative perspective. She is interested in how technological innovation, and innovation systems, can better achieve public interest and social justice goals, as well as in the politics of knowledge and expertise in science and technology policy. She has done research in the United States and Europe, and her current research focuses on India. She is the author of numerous articles and two books: Patent Politics: Life Forms, Markets, and the Public Interest in the United States and Europe (University of Chicago Press, 2017) and Building Genetic Medicine: Breast Cancer, Technology, and the Comparative Politics of Health Care (MIT Press, 2007). Patent Politics received the 2018 Robert K. Merton Award from the Science, Knowledge, and Technology section of the American Sociological Association, for an outstanding book on science, knowledge, or technology. Findings from Building Genetic Medicine influenced the 2013 US Supreme Court decision prohibiting patents on isolated human genes. She holds a Bachelor's degree in Biology from the University of Chicago and Masters and PhD degrees in Science and Technology Studies from Cornell University.
Listen to Audio Record of CSSP Talk "The Constituency of Science and its Tryst with the University" delivered by Dr Avishek Ray, NIT Silchar
Launch of an Atlas on the retreat of Andean glaciers and the reduction of glacial waters
UNESCO Media Advisory No.2018-105
Launch of an Atlas on the retreat of Andean glaciers and the reduction of glacial waters
Paris, 04 December—If current trends continue, some of the lower-altitude glaciers of the tropical Andes could lose between 78 and 97% of their volume by the end of the century, reducing the region's available freshwater resources. This alarming analysis is from the Andean Glacier and Water Atlas that will be launched by UNESCO and the Norwegian GRID-Arendal Foundation, during the COP24 taking place on 3-14 December in Katowice (Poland).
Most glaciers have been retreating for decades due to climate change, a problem that has been particularly acute in the tropical Andes since the 1950s. In Peru, the country with the largest number of tropical glaciers on the continent, glaciers have been retreating rapidly over recent decades and the only glacier that subsists in Venezuela is expected to have melted away by 2021.
A rapid glacial retreat has also been observed since the 1980s in Bolivia, where some glaciers have lost two-thirds or more of their mass. In Chile and Argentina, the retreat of low-lying glaciers in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego is accelerating. In Colombia, it is likely that only the largest glaciers located on the highest peaks will subsist by the 2050s. Dramatic glacial loss has also been observed in Ecuador over the past 50 years.
Glacial meltwater is a critical resource for millions of people, most notably for those living in the Andean highlands of Bolivia, Chile and Peru. It represents about 5% of the water supply in Quito (Ecuador), 61% in La Paz (Bolivia) and 67% in Huaraz (Peru). During a drought year, this proportion can reach 15% in Quito, 85% in La Paz and 91% in Huaraz.
The situation is all the more worrying as annual mean temperatures are rising in the tropical Andes (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela). In these countries, it has increased by approximately 0.8°C over the last century and could rise further by 2 to 5°C by the end of the 21st century. In the southern Andes, temperatures could increase by 1 to 7 °C according to some estimates.
To meet the challenges of ensuring water security for the populations that depend on these glaciers, the Atlas makes a series of recommendations for policy makers in the region. It calls for better integration of scientific data into political decision-making, improved climate change monitoring infrastructure, integrated water resources management, and strengthened coordination between Andean countries.
****
Media contact: Agnès Bardon, UNESCO press service, +33 (0) 1 45 68 17 64, a.bardon@unesco.org
Download the Atlas (in English): http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002658/265810e.pdf
Download the Atlas (in Spanish): http://www.unesco.org/tools/fileretrieve/20cac6a.pdf
UNESCO, 7, place de Fontenoy, PARIS, NA FRANCE France
Friday, November 30, 2018
UNESCO cautions against reckless application of gene editing
UNESCO cautions against reckless application of gene editing
Paris, 29 November—In light of recent reports claiming the birth of the first gene-edited babies, UNESCO reiterates the absolute need to heed internationally agreed principles that affirm the value of human rights and human dignity as the prime concern for any medical research and intervention on human beings.
While developments in genome editing techniques represent a promising scientific advancement with potential benefit for humanity, UNESCO is compelled to remind governments and the scientific community of the ethical principles of the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (1997).
Caution must be exercised when it comes to gene modifications that will pass on to future generations such as germline therapy and human embryo interventions. In this regard, the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO called for a moratorium on genome engineering of the human germline, at least as long as the safety and effectiveness of procedures remain unproven (cf. the 2015 Report on Updating its Reflection on the Human Genome and Human Rights.
In line with these recommendations, UNESCO wishes to remind researchers, institutions and governments to respect universally agreed principles and procedures in research, and calls on governments to cooperate in establishing measures to ensure ethically sound research and application of genome editing techniques that respect human dignity and human rights.
UNESCO will continue to monitor and reflect on emerging ethical issues related to genome editing and other developments in the life sciences. The Organization calls for continued international dialogue on the ethical implications of genome editing for the individual, society and humanity as a whole.
****
UNESCO, 7, place de Fontenoy, PARIS, NA FRANCE France
"India's Jagadish Chandra Bose is the Reason why the World will Enjoy Superfast 5G Internet"
- "The True Laboratory is the Mind, where behind Illusions we uncover the Laws of Truth.": Sir Jagadish Chandra Bose
- Sir J.C. Bose refused to patent most of his inventions, because he believed that knowledge should be available to everyone. He was the pioneer in "open innovation" in India.
- "India's Jagadish Chandra Bose is the Reason why the World will Enjoy Superfast 5G Internet"
Thursday, November 29, 2018
New Issue of "Asian Biotechnology and Development Review" is released
- Editorial Introduction | K. Ravi Srinivas
- Bayer-Monsanto Merger and India's IP Approach to Agricultural Biotechnology: Navigating through a complex web of law and policy | Kshitij Kumar Singh
- The GM Crop Debate in India: Stakeholders' Interests, Perceptions, Trust and Public Policy | Anurag Kanaujia and Sujit Bhattacharya
- Ethical Considerations in Human Genome Editing–An Indian Perspective | Roli Mathur
- Sustainability in Crop Research and Agricultural Models: Promoting Reliance on Neglected and Underutilised species | Abhinav Jha, Kunal Sinha, Manish Dubey and Ravi Chauhan
- Regulating Genome Edited Crops and European Court of Justice Ruling | K. Ravi Srinivas
- Book Review | Women in Sustainable Agriculture and Food Biotechnology | Amit Kumar
CSSP Lecture "Regulating Biotechnology through the Patent System: Learning from US and European approaches in Comparative Perspective" by Dr Shobita Parthasarathy | 4th December
Centre for Studies in Science Policy
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Invites you to a Special Lecture on
Regulating Biotechnology through the Patent System: Learning from US and European approaches in Comparative Perspective.
Speaker: Dr Shobita Parthasarathy
Professor of Public Policy and Women's Studies (by courtesy);
Director, Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program, University of Michigan, USA
Venue: Room No. 227, 2nd Floor, SSS-1 Building, JNU
Date: Tuesday, 4th December 2018 | 12:00 noon
Abstract: Over the past thirty years, the world's patent systems have experienced pressure from civil society like never before. From farmers to patient advocates, new voices are arguing that patents impact public health, economic inequality, morality—and democracy. These challenges, to domains that we usually consider technical and legal, may seem surprising. But in Patent Politics, the speaker argues that patent systems have always been deeply political and social. To demonstrate this, Parthasarathy takes readers through a particularly fierce and prolonged set of controversies over patents on life forms linked to important advances in biology and agriculture and potentially life-saving medicines in the United States and Europe. Clashes over whose voices and which values matter in the patent system, as well as what counts as knowledge and whose expertise is important, look quite different in these two places. And through these debates, the United States and Europe are developing very different approaches to patent and innovation governance.
About the Speaker: Shobita Parthasarathy is Professor of Public Policy and Women's Studies, and Director of the Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program, at University of Michigan. Her research focuses on the governance of emerging science and technology in comparative perspective. She is interested in how technological innovation, and innovation systems, can better achieve public interest and social justice goals, as well as in the politics of knowledge and expertise in science and technology policy. She has done research in the United States and Europe, and her current research focuses on India. She is the author of numerous articles and two books: Patent Politics: Life Forms, Markets, and the Public Interest in the United States and Europe (University of Chicago Press, 2017) and Building Genetic Medicine: Breast Cancer, Technology, and the Comparative Politics of Health Care (MIT Press, 2007). Patent Politics received the 2018 Robert K. Merton Award from the Science, Knowledge, and Technology section of the American Sociological Association, for an outstanding book on science, knowledge, or technology. Findings from Building Genetic Medicine influenced the 2013 US Supreme Court decision prohibiting patents on isolated human genes. She holds a Bachelor's degree in Biology from the University of Chicago and Masters and PhD degrees in Science and Technology Studies from Cornell University.
All are welcome to attend the Lecture.
Coordinator, CSSP Lecture Series
Tuesday, November 27, 2018
New Report "Data Localisation in a Globalised World: An Indian Perspective"
Chapter 1: Cross-border Data Flows and Why They MatterChapter 2: Data Localization Driving Domestic ProtectionismChapter 3: Sub-optimal Impact Of Forced Data LocalisationChapter 4: Data Localization and the Indian ContextChapter 5: Analysing the Motivation Behind Data Localization In IndiaChapter 6: Alternative Policy MechanismsChapter 7: Greater International CooperationChapter 9: Towards Making India A Big Data Centre HubChapter 10: Comparative Analysis With Other NationsChapter 11: Sectoral AnalysisChapter 12: Content and Thematic Analysis
Monday, November 26, 2018
A Dialogue on Transparency, Open Access and Ethics in Development Research | 4 December | India Habitat Centre, New Delhi
|
Call for Papers: "R&D Management" Special Issue on Innovation Management Research Methods
- Paavo Ritala, Professor, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland | Innovation Research Skills Special Interest Group leader, ISPIM
- Sabrina Schneider, Assistant Professor, University of Kassel, Germany
- Snejina Michailova, Professor, University of Auckland Business School, New Zealand
- Innovation management as a unique discipline. How do specific innovation management characteristics impact the way research methods need to be applied in innovation management research? What characterizes innovation management as a self-standing discipline? Borrowing from neighbouring disciplines. How can we as innovation management researchers learn from and borrow methods used in other disciplines such as psychology or the behavioural sciences? How can we conduct good, systematic inter-disciplinary work that can enhance innovation management research?
- (Innovative) research designs. How can existing research designs be adapted to suit the particular requirements of innovation management research? Which new research design formats might emerge?
- New units and levels of analysis in innovation management. What kind of challenges and opportunities are there when studying broad and often loosely-coupled forms of organizing such as innovation ecosystems and platform-based markets? How can we study innovation management issues in structures that involve a large number of actors and fewer possibilities for "management" or "coordination" than in more traditional, well-defined structures?
- Measurement issues in innovation management research. How can we measure the seemingly immeasurable concepts used in innovation management research? How can we adapt existing methods of measurement from other disciplines to the innovation management context?
- Model specification in innovation management. How can we identify appropriate and complete model specifications in the context of innovation management research? How can we select meaningful mediators and moderators to refine / extend / challenge current innovation management theories?
- Theorizing in innovation management research. How can we develop theory from empirical data in innovation management that suits the field's distinct features?
- Data sources. How can we create appropriate samples to answer research questions in innovation management? How can new and emerging sources of data (such as those provided by social media) be leveraged in innovation management research? How can we deal with methodological challenges and the opportunities that big data generates?
- Methods and practical impact. How can we utilize methods that allow better communication of the results so that they are understood outside of academia? How can we combine rigorous research methods with practical relevance without compromising any of them? How can we foster academic and practitioner collaboration in innovation management research?
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2015). Reflections on the 2013 decade award - „Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivitiy dilemma revisited" Ten years later. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 497–514.Bono, J. E., & McNamara, G. (2011). From the editors: Publishing in AMJ - Part 2: Research design. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 657–660.Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. (2011). From the editors: Publishing in AMJ - Part 1: topic choice. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432–435.Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.Gawer, A., & Henderson, R. (2007). Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(1), 1-34.Klijn, M., & Tomic, W. (2010). A review of creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective. Journal of Management Development, 29(4), 322-343.Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238.Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2017). Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Science. Published online.Ritala, P., Agouridas, V., Assimakopoulos, D., & Gies, O. (2013). Value creation and capture mechanisms in innovation ecosystems: a comparative case study. International Journal of Technology Management, 63(3-4), 244-267.Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage–How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420-430.Sørensen, F., Mattsson, J., & Sundbo, J. (2010). Experimental methods in innovation research. Research Policy, 39(3), 313–322.Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2013). Managing innovation integrating technological, market and organizational change. 5th Ed. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Call for Participation: Webinar on ICT Innovation in Education | 27th November, 14:00-15:30 IST (16:30-18:00, Beijing Time)
Smart Education Webinar
ICT in Education and ICT Innovation in Education
27th November 2018, 14:00-15:30 IST (16:30-18:00, Beijing Time (GMT+8))
To Celebrate "Belt and Road Open Education Learning Week" | 26-30 November 2018
Join the Webinar: https://meet657481205.adobeconnect.com/smarteducationwebinar201811/
OER ensures various educational materials can be freely retained, reused, remixed, revised, and redistributed, and opens the door to innovation and creativity by encouraging creation, co-creation and sharing. This webinar focuses on the use of OER to promote innovation, design and learning.
This webinar is 90 minutes in length, from 14:00-13:30, Indian Standard Time (IST) and each presenter is expected to present less than 30 minutes. Here is the website to join the meeting: https://meet657481205.adobeconnect.com/smarteducationwebinar201811/. This webinar uses guest login mode to ensure everyone who has interest could participate in the webinars, so you just need to input you name and click "enter" (If you have an Adobe account, you are free to use it too). But please use your real name rather than nickname, so the host can identify you.
The Webinar includes a presentation on "Recent Innovations in Educational Technology in India for the Delivery of Lifelong Learning", by Dr Anup Kumar Das, Convener, Open Access India.






